So I originally went to this jackhole pqme and ultimately his report sucked and before it sucked it was objected to for being untimely. I went to another pqme and his report reflected the reporting of my 3 doctors and he said i had not had proper treatment, no apportionment and not P&S. So lo and behold I get a supplementary report from my new pqme that says he reviewed the report from the first pqme and although he said his opinions were unchanged I'm curious as to the appropriateness of him viewing the first pqme report.
Here are my issues A) this report shouldn't be part of my record because it was objected to and shouldn't have been paid for and B) the defense atty who gave it to the new pqme is trying to color his new report and I think that gives my atty to disqualify new report at trial and do I potentially have a reason to file a complaint against her with the Cal Bar Assoc.?
Thanks in advance for your opinions i have not yet been able to discuss this with my atty.