There should have been a WCMSA vendor compile the proposal based on the past 2 years of your treatment records. Then the proposal is submitted to CMS/Medicare for review... just because the threasholds are triggered by the dollar -value of your claim/settlement doesnt' mean someone actually reviews the proposal...in you case, however it appears to have been the case.
Have said that... there is no appeal process once CMS has reviewed/approved the WCMSA... it stands as is. (I am going through the same issues right now... so I'm familiar with what I speak)
Quote:
|
They knew the low balled the amount because their attorney sent me an agreement to sign and it stated their amount and also included that if Medicare proposed a higher amount they would agree to it. The agreement was for the WC judge to sign. They never filed it. Obviously!
|
If the carrier/CA and the DA signed, and you and your AA signed...that is an agreement and should be binding with/with out the judge. A judge usually only signs off on the final...final agreement to ensure your best intersts have been met, and the law held.
Quote:
|
BTW, I'm not thinking of jumping at the first proposal, even though the attorney was telling me I could have a check in my hand by next week. He was trying everything to get me to agree.
|
Sounds like you have a substantial MSA here... if there is indemnity, or life pension to be paid, have you considered a annuity to fund the accounts...one for MSA, one for non-Medicare medical and one for the remaining indemnity un paid... (there is a second portion to the future medical.... an amount that is not accoutable to Medicare... has anyone discussed that with you ?)
Annuities would provde a guaranteed tax free stream of income forlife...its called a Structured Settlement. And you could very well be receiving more money in the long run vs a lump sum. Investment income from the lump sum is fully taxable.