To further expand upon your current "IME" topic dicussion:
Might you be able to explain to us why it is that some IC "IME's/QME's" are so brief, while others are not ? (No-frills vrs. the works).
I understand that the medical speciality of the evaluating Dr. will differ as do the individual dynamics of an IW's injury(s)....yet the logistic's of the majority of "experiences" that I've read about, do not leave much room for what appears to be a fair and balanced reporting protocol within this particular group of physicians.
In addition; what constitutes a "regular" Medical- Legal Evaluation as opposed to a "Complex" Medical-Legal Evaluation ?
I thank you in advance for your response.