Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 1971
    Posts
    5,085

    Default The Definition of a Trial

    A real trial is when witnesses and evidence are presented to prove guilt or innocence, neither was present during the Fake Impeachment trial of Donald Trump.
    Trump has no low, he actually had unprotected sex with a prostitute the first week his wife was home with their first baby - need I say more about his integrity?
    Morals such as this now define the Republican Party which explains why using tax dollars to extort a foreign leader to interfere in our elections seems like "no harm done" in their world.

    The criminal Senate along with Moscow Mitch conspired with Donald Trump to cover up evidence that could've easily resulted in his removal from office.
    They've unleashed an unhinged psychopath on witnesses that participated in the impeachment inquiry and this country.
    These are dangerous times, this madman has no limits - it's anyone's guess what stunt he'll pull next to undermine our constitution and harm our Democracy.

    This weekend the Draft Dodging Con Man (now emboldened) fired decorated military Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman for upholding his oath of office by testifying and telling the truth.
    Out of pure revenge, Trump also fired Vindman's twin brother, Lt. Col. Yevgeny Vindman, inspite of him having no involvement in the case.
    To be sure he covered all the bases, the draft dodging coward also fired Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union who also testified truthfully of the crimes committed by the predator.

    That so called impeachment trial doesn't fit the legal definition of a trial - Trump wasn't acquitted, he was let off the hook by his co- conspirators.
    See the below definition of "trial" you won't find one element defined in the definition in that fake Impeachment Hearing - It was a hoax perpetuated against the American Public to conceal the crimes and abuses of power committed by Donald J. Trump.

    The Most Serious Obstruction of All: The Vote to Block Witnesses and the Public’s Right to Know
    Many criticized the Senate’s vote “to deprive itself of information” by blocking John Bolton and other witnesses from testifying in the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump. What makes the matter worse is that the Senate choked off the American public from hearing that information too, and at the time it mattered most.
    what makes the Republican-controlled Senate’s trampling on the public’s right to know and to inform their congressional representatives of their views especially offensive. The Republican leadership’s action came at a point when citizens’ exercise of these rights would have counted most. That was no accident. It wasn’t that these senators personally did not want to hear more before deciding on the final verdict. They apparently didn’t want the public to hear any more either.
    https://www.justsecurity.org/68453/t...right-to-know/

    U.S. Attorneys Justice 101
    Trial
    After many weeks or months of preparation, the prosecutor is ready for the most important part of his job: the trial. The trial is a structured process where the facts of a case are presented to a jury, and they decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the charge offered. During trial, the prosecutor uses witnesses and evidence to prove to the jury that the defendant committed the crime(s). The defendant, represented by an attorney, also tells his side of the story using witnesses and evidence.
    https://www.justice.gov/usao/justice-101/trial

    Trump fires key impeachment witnesses Sondland, Lt. Col. Vindman in purge
    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/tru...orney-n1132526

    Not that it matters but retaliation against a federal employee for reporting waste fraud or abuse is illegal - of course King Trump is above the law.

    October 10, 2012
    PRESIDENTIAL POLICY DIRECTIVE/_PPD-19
    SUBJECT: Protecting Whistleblowers with Access to
    Classified Information
    This Presidential Policy Directive ensures that employees (1)
    serving in the Intelligence Community or (2) who are eligible
    for access to classified information can effectively report
    waste, fraud, and abuse while protecting classified national
    security information.
    It prohibits retaliation against employees
    for reporting waste, fraud, and abuse.

    To ensure the timely and effective implementation of the goals
    of this directive, I hereby direct that the following actions be
    taken:
    A. Prohibition on Retaliation in the Intelligence Community
    Any officer or employee of a Covered Agency who has authority to
    take, direct others to take, recommend, or approve any Personnel
    Action, shall not, with respect to such authority, take or fail
    to take, or threaten to take or fail to take, a Personnel Action
    with respect to any employee serving in an Intelligence
    Community Element as a reprisal for a Protected Disclosure.
    https://www.opm.gov/our-inspector-ge...ppd-19-moa.pdf

    Tony
    Moderator Responses are based on my personal bias, experience and research - They do not represent the views of the admin nor may be accepted in the legal community, always consult an attorney.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 1971
    Posts
    5,085

    Default THe Crime Syndicate

    Absolutely incredible, it's only been a week since the criminal Senate turned this psychopath lose on America and he's already attacking Federal Judges and abusing his power by weaponizing the DOJ.
    The White House, State Department and Senate have become a crime syndicate gone wild.

    Trump just made the DOJ’s Roger Stone intervention look even worse
    Trump directly implicated Attorney General William P. Barr, which will only increase questions about Barr doing his political bidding.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...tone-decision/

    Tony
    Moderator Responses are based on my personal bias, experience and research - They do not represent the views of the admin nor may be accepted in the legal community, always consult an attorney.

Similar Threads

  1. Definition of Terms
    By pas2355 in forum New York
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-01-2013, 08:00 PM
  2. Definition of Pre Existing Conditions Please
    By GBGB in forum New Jersey
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-19-2009, 02:09 PM
  3. Definition of 'Washout'
    By legal in forum Legal Issues
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-04-2005, 03:03 PM
  4. Beware of the Sington Definition
    By anonymous in forum Michigan
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-11-2003, 05:38 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
 


Find a Lawyer